Bill to amend SEZ law surpassed by using Lok Sabha
An invoice that seeks to permit trusts to set up units in unique monetary zones using amending the SEZ regulation was surpassed via Lok Sabha Wednesday.
The Special Economic Zones (Amendment) Bill, 2019 became the first rule to surpass the newly-constituted seventeenth Lok Sabha.
It will now be moved for passage in Rajya Sabha, in which the government lacks numbers.
Introducing the invoice, Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal said that unique monetary zones (SEZs) play a critical position in selling exports and financial growth of the u. S.
The Special Economic Zones (Amendment) Bill, 2019 will replace the Special Economic Zones (Amendment) Ordinance, 2019, which became promulgated in March.
The ordinance had paved the way for trusts to install gadgets in those zones.
Responding to questions about wanting to bring the ordinance by the previous government, Goyal said when you consider that Parliament turned into not functioning and the invoice changed into stuck, the directive was issued.
The minister also rejected pointers by the Congress chief in Lok Sabha Adhir Ranjan Chowdhury that SEZ’s concept has failed in India.
He said if favored effects have not been achieved, the other Congress-led UPA government will be blamed. He stated withdrawal of tax incentives in 2011 turned into a prime purpose for the SEZ now not giving the predicted effects.
Goyal stated in 2014, SEZs created 12 lakh jobs, and in 2019, it rose to 20 lakh.
After the ordinance was issued, the government has received six applications to set up SEZs, he said.
Chowdhury and Bhagwant Mann (AAP) puzzled as to why Jharkhand and Punjab lack SEZs.
Goyal said that it’d be a first step to encompass trusts and any other entity or commercial enterprise bureaucracy that might come inside the destiny within the definition of “humans” below the SEZ Act 2005.
He brought that the law got here in 2005, and matters have been modified considering that then and now trusts have come forward for investments.
Goyal also stated that to make India a global economic center, the government set up GIFT metropolis in Gujarat and has a deliberate installation in different components. The city is a sort of SEZ.
“This is a fast evolving international, and we should pass forward with this,” he added.
Later transferring a resolution opposing the ordinance, RSP’s N K Premachandran said that a law might be added handiest beneath compelling instances as in line with the Constitution. The government is not following this.
“This isn’t an awesome practice and excellent governance…What was the difficulty or emergency to deliver this ordinance? I cannot locate any motive to promulgate such an ordinance at the time of the election,” he said.
He requested as to whom the authorities desired to gain through this ordinance.
He alleged that permitting the government to notify any entity to set up devices in SEZs could cast off Parliament’s powers to take a call on such issues.
By allowing this, it’d be up to the authorities’ fancy to allow such entities to install devices and experience the benefits he delivered.
The resolution was later rejected by way of the House by using a voice vote.
Participating inside the dialogue, Rajiv Pratap Rudy (BJP) said the government took steps to sell economic boom via these laws and no longer benefited any character.
However, he expressed the issue that only a few or no SEZs were an installation in states like Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Jharkhand.
Rudy additionally said that significant tracts of land were obtained for SEZs; however, the only restricted area changed into utilized for the purpose.
Supriya Sule (NCP) supported such zones, saying they are a critical part of the activity creation environment.
B Mahtab (BJD) puzzled whether investments could come in the SEZs at a time while the world marketplace was dealing with gloom and said taking the ordinance route need to be avoided.
Participating in the discussion, Shashi Tharoor (Congress) said SEZ could be driving the financial system’s engines, but resorting to ordinance should be stopped.
He also stated that “the new India should start giving credit to antique India.”
Sudip Bandyopadhyay (TMC)said, “We oppose any ordinance until urgently wanted…This authority has the habit of assignment any small concept as massive idea.”
Senthil Kumar (DMK) puzzled the government at the urgency of issuing the ordinance.
Vinayak Raut (Shiv Sena) stated that increasingly more SEZs have to be installed on barren land.