Type to search

Have Social Media companies helped TN Police fight Cyber Crimes? Affidavit in Madras HC has solutions

Cyber law

Have Social Media companies helped TN Police fight Cyber Crimes? Affidavit in Madras HC has solutions


A plea filed final year to link Aadhaar with electronic mail has correctly culminated within the Madras High Court coordinating efforts via law enforcement organizations and major social media middleman agencies to discover extra powerful approaches to scale back on-line crime.
Social media giants WhatsApp, Twitter, Facebook, Google and YouTube had been impleaded within the case last year. Further, at some stage in a hearing hung on Thursday, the High Court allowed NGO, Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) to implead itself in the case.
The social media businesses also sought time to reply to a commonplace report filed by means of the State authorities in Tamil Nadu. The Bench, in turn, directed that their replies be filed by means of July 17.
Bar & Bench accessed the Government file – filed on behalf of the State of Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu Information Technology Department and the State Police – which has info on how some distance such intermediaries have cooperated on the subject of requests made with the aid of Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA) to resource research in cyber crime.
The State Government has cited a case from Salem (2016) to highlight why social media intermediaries have to be made to respond expeditiously when requests for information are made by way of LEA.
In this case, a morphed picture of a woman become uploaded directly to a faux Facebook profile. The Salem police had asked Facebook for IP logs and different data of the faux Facebook account. However, this information was no longer furnished with the aid of Facebook for 4 days. In the meanwhile, the girl devoted suicide. It turned into best a day after her death that Facebook supplied the statistics, which led the the police to trace the crime to a local man or woman.
The file become filed on the High Court’s path issued in the sooner listening to hung on June 6. Notable takeaways from the document are summarised beneath.
On how Social Media Intermediaries reply to requests for information via LEA
The file informs that social media intermediaries might also aid in the investigation of on line crimes, on a request being made through the LEA, within the following methods i.E.
Imparting account records, IP logs etc. Of the suspected perpetrator
presenting information/content material published or transmitted through an account holder suspected of getting dedicated an offence so that the identical may be used as proof
casting off/deleting objectionable content from on-line systems.
As for a way a ways the social media groups have cooperated while requests for such aid are made, the commonplace record states,
“The content requests made by using LEAs are continually denied by SMIs [Social Media Intermediaries]…
…. Simplest a part of requests with regard to get admission to IP logs and account information are universal and provided. Facebook supplied facts looked for in fifty two% of cases. Twitter in fifty eight% of instances, WhatsApp in 15% of cases, Google in seventy seven% of instances and YouTube in 4% of instances have furnished statistics looked for, even as remaining case statistics sought for changed into now not provided.
Requests from LEA to eliminate content material were additionally complied with handiest partly. Facebook removed content in sixty two% of requests, Twitter in fifty three% of instances and YouTube in fifty two% of cases have removed content material, even as in final instances they did not take away the content material.”
The document goes directly to outline two huge motives stated through social media agencies whilst the information looked for via the LEA isn’t supplied, i.E.
The social media organizations unearths that there’s no violation of the “Terms of Use”
Under the applicable regulation and phrases of carrier, a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) or Letter Rogatory (LR) is needed.
In response, the State has argued that such reasons must no longer stand within the way of requests made by using LEAs on the subject of the investigation of cybercrime, while the offensive transaction takes place within India’s territorial limits. As said in the file,
“Just because the SMIs are storing the captured records outdoor the us of a, does now not mean that the LEA need to observe LR/MLAT procedure to are seeking such facts. Hence SMIs can be directed to offer information searched for by using LEA usa91 CrPC without asking to return via LR/MLAT technique.
…whilst an activity of an man or woman is in violation of Indian law and a criminal case is registered through LEA, the SMIs cannot take a seat in judgment as to whether such activity is in violation in their Terms of Use or now not, The Officer investigating the case seeks data bearing on the interest which is part of against the law to show proof earlier than a Court of Law which can not be denied with the aid of the SMIs.”
The case for fixing greater responsibility on social media agencies
The State authorities in the long run calls at the Madras High Court to fix extra responsibility on social media agencies in relation to monitoring content material and cooperating within the research of on line crimes.
“A absolutely nameless world wherein anyone can put up any content with an assurance that there may be no way to hint them will result in chaos in the society,” argues the Government.
This specific submission changed into made in view of WhatsApp’s continued assertion that it can not track down the original sender of a WhatsApp message given its end-to-stop encryption policy. The State has argued for WhatsApp to find a technical answer. The report states,
“… Without the technical solution from WhatsApp, it isn’t always possible to hit upon and locate such culprits [of online crimes]. Hence, inside the interest of public order, WhatsApp can be directed to construct a mechanism to trace the original source from where an objectionable publish/photograph is first uploaded.”
It is going directly to argue that the sort of mechanism may be advanced without breaking WhatsApp’s stop-to-quit encryption policy.
“…. The LEA best requests for the supply of the objectionable put up and aren’t stressful the breaking of stop to cease encryption. WhatsApp is difficult among the privacy issues and anonymity. Technical solution can be built to hint the originator without breaking end-fashion encryption. There should be responsibility for the data circulated by way of a consumer on the platform.”
On how social media businesses can be made more responsible in curtailing on line crime
The file concludes with the aid of placing forth the subsequent suggestions to resource in the monitoring and regulation of on line crime.