Type to search

Have Social Media companies helped TN Police fight Cyber Crimes? Affidavit in Madras HC has solutions

Have Social Media companies helped TN Police fight Cyber Crimes? Affidavit in Madras HC has solutions


A plea filed final year to link Aadhaar with electronic mail has correctly culminated within the Madras High Court coordinating efforts via law enforcement organizations and major social media middleman agencies to discover extra powerful approaches to scale back on-line crime.
Social media giants WhatsApp, Twitter, Facebook, Google and YouTube, had been impleaded within the case last year. Further, at some stage in a hearing hung on Thursday, the High Court allowed NGO, Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) to implead itself in the case.
The social media businesses also sought to reply to a commonplace report filed utilizing the State authorities in Tamil Nadu. The Bench, in turn, directed that their replies be filed using July 17.
Bar & Bench accessed the Government file – filed on behalf of the State of Tamil Nadu, the Tamil Nadu Information Technology Department and the State Police – which has info on how some distance such intermediaries have cooperated on the subject of requests made with the aid of Law Enforcement Agencies (LEA) to resource research in cybercrime.
The State Government has cited a case from Salem (2016) to highlight why social media intermediaries have to be made to respond expeditiously when requests for information are made by way of LEA.
In this case, a morphed picture of a woman become uploaded directly to a faux Facebook profile. The Salem police had asked Facebook for IP logs and different data of the faux Facebook account. However, this information was no longer furnished with the aid of Facebook for 4 days. In the meanwhile, the girl devoted suicide. It turned into best a day after her death that Facebook supplied the statistics, which led the police to trace the crime to a local man or woman.
The file becomes filed on the High Court’s path issued sooner, listening to hung on June 6. Notable takeaways from the document are summarized beneath.
On how Social Media Intermediaries reply to requests for information via LEA
The file informs that social media intermediary might also aid in investigating online crimes, on a request being made through the LEA, within the following methods i.E.
Imparting account records, IP logs, etc. Of the suspected perpetrator
presenting information/content material published or transmitted through an account holder suspected of getting dedicated an offense so that the identical may be used as proof
casting off/deleting objectionable content from on-line systems.
As for a way ways the social media groups have cooperated while requests for such aid are made, the commonplace record states,
“The content requests made by using LEAs are continually denied by SMIs [Social Media Intermediaries]…
…. Simplest a part of requests about getting admission to IP logs and account information are universal and provided. Facebook supplied facts looked for in fifty-two% of cases. Twitter in fifty eight% of instances, WhatsApp in 15% of cases, Google in seventy seven% of instances, and YouTube in 4% of instances have furnished statistics looked for, even as remaining case statistics sought for changed into now not provided.
Requests from LEA to eliminate content material additionally complied with handiest partly. Facebook removed content in sixty-two% of requests, Twitter in fifty-three% of instances and YouTube in fifty-two% of cases have removed content material, even as in final instances they did not take away the content material.”
The document goes directly to outline two huge motives stated through social media agencies whilst the information looked for via the LEA isn’t supplied, i.E.
The social media organizations unearth that there’s no violation of the “Terms of Use.”
Under the applicable regulation and phrases of the carrier, a Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty (MLAT) or Letter Rogatory (LR) is needed.
In response, the State has argued that such reasons must no longer stand within the way of requests made by using LEAs on the investigation of cybercrime. At the same time, the offensive transaction takes place within India’s territorial limits. As said in the file,
“Just because the SMIs are storing the captured records outdoor us of a, does now not mean that the LEA need to observe LR/MLAT procedure to are seeking such facts. Hence SMIs can be directed to offer information searched for by using LEA usa91 CrPC without asking to return via LR/MLAT technique.
…whilst an activity of a man or woman violates Indian law. A criminal case is registered through LEA; the SMIs cannot take a seat in judgment as to whether such activity is in violation of their Terms of Use or now not; the Officer investigating the case seeks data bearing on the interest which is part of against the law to show proof earlier than a Court of Law which can not be denied with the aid of the SMIs.”
The case for fixing greater responsibility on social media agencies
The State authorities in the long run, call at the Madras High Court to fix extra responsibility on social media agencies about monitoring content material and cooperating within the research of online crimes.
“An absolutely nameless world wherein anyone can put up any content with an assurance that there may be no way to hint them will result in chaos in the society,” argues the Government.
This specific submission changed into made given WhatsApp’s continued assertion that it can not track down the original sender of a WhatsApp message given its end-to-stop encryption policy. The State has argued for WhatsApp to find a technical answer. The report states,
“… Without the technical solution from WhatsApp, it isn’t always possible to hit upon and locate such culprits [of online crimes]. Hence, inside the interest of public order, WhatsApp can be directed to construct a mechanism to trace the source from where an objectionable publish/photograph is first uploaded.”
It is going directly to argue that the sort of mechanism may be advanced without breaking WhatsApp’s stop-to-quit encryption policy.
“…. The LEA best requests for the supply of the objectionable put up and aren’t stressful the breaking of a stop to cease encryption. WhatsApp is difficult among the privacy issues and anonymity. The technical solution can be built to hint at the originator without breaking end-fashion encryption. There should be the responsibility for the data circulated by way of a consumer on the platform.”
On how social media businesses can be made more responsible in curtailing online crime
The file concludes with the aid of placing forth the subsequent suggestions to resource in the monitoring and regulating online crime.

Elizabeth Coleman

I am a lawyer by profession and a blogger by passion. I started blogging to express my views on various issues.The blog has now become one of my passions. After seeing so many of my friends and colleagues using blogs for their business purposes, I decided to share my views through my blog.I love reading other people's blogs. I am trying to write one every day, and sometimes when I have time I write two or three posts per day.